By 
South Africa has now entered into a phase that might break its backbone, the contestation of the ever so crucial question, that of the land; an issue that will put a serious test to the Government of National Unity (GNU). To some, it has been long overdue for President Cyril Ramaphosa to sign into law the Expropriation Bill, and yet to some, it is irrational.
Repealing the apartheid era Expropriation Bill Act of 1975 that favoured the minority, Ramaphosa officially signed into law the Expropriation Bill on Thursday, 23 January 2025, which empowers all organs of the state, from local, provincial and national authority to expropriate land in the public interest for varied reasons.
The Bill has undergone a five-year process of public consultation and parliamentary deliberation, aligns legislation on expropriation with the Constitution.
According to the Presidency, Section 25 of the Constitution recognises expropriation as an essential mechanism for the state to acquire someone’s property for a public purpose or in the public interest, subject to just and equitable compensation being paid.
Up to now, expropriation of property has been governed in terms of the Expropriation Act of 1975, which predates the expropriation mechanism provided for in section 25(2) of the Constitution.
“The Bill assented to by President Ramaphosa outlines how expropriation can be done and on what basis. This law will assist all organs of State – local, provincial and national authorities – to expropriate land in the public interest for varied reasons.
Local, provincial and national authorities will use this legislation to expropriate land in the public interest for varied reasons that seek, among others, to promote inclusivity and access to natural resources,” said Vincent Magwenya, the Spokesperson to the President.
The Bill repeals the Expropriation Act and to provide a common framework in line with the Constitution to guide the processes and procedures for expropriation of property by organs of state.
In terms of this law, an expropriating authority may not expropriate property arbitrarily or for a purpose other than a public purpose or in the public interest.
Expropriation may not be exercised unless the expropriating authority has without success attempted to reach an agreement with the owner or holder of a right in property for the acquisition thereof on reasonable terms.
An expropriating authority is therefore obliged to enter into negotiations with the owner of a property required for such purposes.
An expropriating authority must also attempt to reach an agreement on the acquisition of the property before resorting to expropriation – except in circumstances where the right to use property temporarily is taken on an urgent basis in terms of a provision in the legislation
The law provides for disputes to be referred for mediation or to appropriate courts.
